“Facadism” and Contemporary Architectural Heritage
The extensive interventions that have been carried out recently on buildings belonging to the contemporary architectural heritage in Greece bring up the discussion about the design and the methods applied for the restoration and the adjustment of these buildings to new uses. The choices depend largely on marketing laws, on models formed through the international experience and adopted by the general public, as well as on the personal views of the architects. The results of these choices are multiple: they are usually very attractive, from a point of view of aesthetics, but at the same time they reveal a wide range of views regarding the inherent values of these buildings. Among the various ways of intervention and adjustment for new uses, the prevailing one lately is the preservation of the façade and the addition of new constructions in the interior of the building. This practice, which is adopted at an international level, is widely known under the term ‘facadism’. It has as many supporters as opponents, and has given rise to much controversy. The mere preservation of the façade can be an exceptional practice, forming a background, bearing evidence of an edifice that has existed at this spot, but it can hardly be described as an act towards the preservation of our architectural heritage. |
25/02/2007 |
Echoe |
In March 2006 the Council of State (5th Chamber) accepted the application submitted by citizens for the annulment of decisions taken by the Minister of Culture, the Minister for the Environment, Physical Planning and Public Works and the Municipality of Athens respectively: |